Sunday, May 27, 2007

Peru: New and Improved

I will start off this entry with an apology (to all 3 of my readers) for the lack of entries in the past week or so. I just haven't had any decent time for updates, because in Kaitlin's and my efforts to cover so much ground in so little time, there wasn't a ton of time to sit down and write a decent blog entry. So here is my attempt to make up for that. Maybe even the first of several attempts.

From Copacabana, Bolivia, where we last let off, we took a bus across the border to Puno, Peru, and then to Cuzco. Cuzco is really Peru's showpiece town. It is dramatic and gorgeous: an amazing main plaza whose architecture combines Inca-era stonework (enormous stones--who knows how they carved them and moved them to where they are now--that interlock perfectly, without any need for mortar) and colonial Spanish cathedrals. The cathedrals themselves are a bit politically incorrect, with a ton of depictions of St. James (Santiago is St. James, right?) riding his horse roughshod over bloody (defiant) brown natives, but this can actually be overlooked if you focus on the elaborate stone carvings in the entryways of the buildings, and the bright Andean touches given to traditional Catholic iconogrpahy (ie, the Virgin Mary whose head is surrounded not by a halo but rather by a sun, a nod to Inti, the sun god of the Incas).

Cuzco's main plaza is also surrounded by restaurants on balconies where you can sit and have ají de gallina and a pisco sour (sorry Chileans, but the Peruvian one IS better than the Chilean one) and watch the Cuzqueños chase after the gringos trying to sell them tour packages and/or postcards, and watch the gringos' awkward responses (will they just ignore them? try to engage them in a clunky English-language conversation? run away? We saw all these, and other, variations). You can also dign into some cuy, or guinea pig--an Andean specialty. We didn't, though. I have too many memories of Wickers Berkeley, my fourth grade class's pet guinea pig. May he rest in peace.

Following our explorations of Cuzco proper, we took excursions out of town as well. First to the Sacred Valley, where we saw the Sunday markets in Pisac and Chinchero (pictured)
. There was cool stuff but I didn't get much. We also went to the lesser-known (in comparison to Machu Picchu, at least) Inca archaeological sites of Ollantaytambo and Pisac. Ollantaytambo is one of the few sites where the Spanish colonizers lost a battle to the Incas, so it's an extra special site. It's also lit up really beautifully at night. Here is a pic of the terraces of Ollantaytambo:

And then, of course, Machu Picchu. This was my third time there, and it was just as cool as ever. The sun was shining and we got some amazing photos. One thing I did differently this time was that we went and had lunch at the Machu Picchu Sanctuary Lodge, a 5-star hotel located right next to the ruins. We paid something like $30 each for it, which has to be close to a week's minimum wage in Peru. It was good food, and a look into a whole different approach to tourism in the third world, which basically involves protecting yourself in an uppity little bubble that manages to block you off from all the ugly poverty surrounding you.

Peru has really developed since I first went there in 2001. The changes are really evident. There is much better road infrastructure, nicer green areas, more tourist facilities, and a general feeling of stability and safety. We had a really nice time in Cuzco.

From there, we headed to Arequipa.

To be continued...

4 comments:

Bridget said...

Carl, your memories of Cuzco and Machu Picchu bring pack happy recollections of the time that we and you visited Peru in December of 2005. Cuzco was a really spectacular place then -- I'm glad that it continues to be the tourist destination of choice in South America.

We remember the aji de gallina at the balcony restaurants overlooking the Plaza Major in Cuzco. Delicious! We must not have noticed Santiago treading down the indigenous, but we do recall paintings that show Jesus and the disciples eating cuy at the last supper. Anachronistic, but tasty.

You didn't mention "El Inka," Garcilaso de la Vega, but visiting his remains in the Cuzco Cathedral made a big impression. He was the one who, in his "Comentarios reales," said that the Incas more readily became Christian than the adherents of other indigenous religions because faith in their own deities prepared them for a "new God" from over the sea.

Did you and Caitlin arrive at Machu Picchu via the 6:00 AM train, just as we did back in 2005? What a great adventure, to dine at the Sanctuary Lodge! Did your book your trip through our old friend Guillermo?

In 2005, you had already returned to Santiago when we went to Ollantaytambo and Pisac. We wish we had been with you and Caitlin. Thank you for refreshing those unforgettable memories.

Anonymous said...

YAY!! comments are back. did you ever figure out why your last post didn't allow comments? i thought you disabled it because you didn't like my last comment.

so far, peru seems a lot more entertaining for tourists than the other places that you have visited. i am glad you didn't eat the guinea pigs... i understand "when in rome..." but some things are just a little too far out there... especially when dinner consists of something americans usually have as pets or lab experiment subjects.

i remember pisco sour- you gave me a bottle several years ago... good! i was just thinking that it might be good mixed with sprite!

the stonework sounds awesome. before the fall of atlantis, the people on this planet were highly evolved and were capable of more than we are now. ex. the pyramids... or so says my dad. hehe

hope all is going well... glad you and kaitlin got so much done and enjoyed yourselves. i can't wait to see all of the photos. be safe, have fun... love you!

Bridget said...

One little comment about Santiago that is even more politically incorrect than your comment (about Saint James "riding his horse roughshod over bloody (defiant) brown natives." Well, the real Santiago didn't ride over the Hispanic indigenous. He rode over the Muslims, the proto-Jihadis of the 600s and 700s. I'm surprised that President Bush hasn't invoked Santiago in prayer for the troops in Iraq.

Bridget said...

One little comment about Santiago that is even more politically incorrect than your comment (about Saint James "riding his horse roughshod over bloody (defiant) brown natives." Well, the real Santiago didn't ride over the Hispanic indigenous. He rode over the Muslims, the proto-Jihadis of the 600s and 700s. I'm surprised that President Bush hasn't invoked Santiago in prayer for the troops in Iraq.